Washington DC -- The final day of the World Bank/IMF
protests ranged from stand offs between protestors and police, an obsession
with violence on the part of the media, and excitement and hopefulness from
organizers and activists.
The main event of the day was a lively, peaceful, spontaneous march from
the ellipse to Washington Circle. There, the marchers were stopped by rows
of police in riot gear. While some drifted away, several hundred stayed,
and many sat down defiantly. Although there was nothing at stake
tactically, the time had come for a final confrontation. Pepper gas was
sprayed directly in the faces of few protestors. The police numbers
increased, tear gas came out and the police appeared to prepare to clear
out all the demonstrators. Buses were on hand to cart hundreds of
demonstrators off to jail.
But just at the height of the tension, an arrangement was negotiated. The
police would put away their tear gas and show their badges (required by law
anyway). Those determined to be arrested would pass through the police
barricade unharmed, and would be arrested without violence. The process
took hours; at least 400 were arrested.
That simple end to a tense stand off, like the whole week in Washington,
showed that despite careful study of events in Seattle, the Washington DC
police provoked violence where none was necessary and violated protestors'
first amendment rights. John Sellars, the Director of Ruckus Society
speculates that this is because the decentralized, consensus-based decision
making process is so far out of their experience that they cannot deal with
Police and media, perhaps suffering the culture gap that Sellars describes,
even seemed surprised when today's denouement of arrests brought about a
cheerful street party in a driving rain, as remaining demonstrators
serenaded the arrestees with music and dancing. It seems clear that the
lack of understanding, civil rights violations and police-provoked violence
threaten to re-occur at the Democratic and Republican Conventions and other
At the end of this wet, chilly day, Corporate Watch asked a number of
activists to think beyond the tactical issues of the demonstration and
discuss the next steps for this movement.
They identified several directions the movement should focus on over the
coming months. The most obvious next step, says Kay Treakle of the Washington
D.C.-based Bank Information Center, is to "keep the pressure on -- that's
the only thing that changes the Bank's behavior." That pressure will next
manifest itself at the Bank's annual meeting in Prague in September. But,
says Andrea Durbin of Friends of the Earth, "Prague alone will not do it
for us." She believes more sustained action is needed.
Some, like David Hunter of the Center for International Environmental Law
look to movements like the War on Poverty of the 1960's, when activists
took over the Washington Mall for an entire month. Durban suggests a War on
Global Poverty, with a similar long-running demonstration.
Others, like Danny Kennedy, the Director of San-Francisco-based Project
Underground say that taking on the global financial architecture includes
the corporations themselves. He hopes the movement can agree on targetting
a single corporation for a lesson in the ultimate in accountability -
shutting it down.
In fact, Rainforest Action Network is set to launch a campaign against
Citigroup this week in New York. Citigroup, the largest financial company
in the world, has its fingers in a vast array of projects around the globe, affecting human rights, environment, economic development and more. RAN doesn't plan to shut it down Citi anytime soon, but it has committed to a long-term campaign to reform the financial giant.
A another element that activists identify as crucial to following through on is continuing to build the process of grassroots globalization -- particularly North-South cooperation. Oronto Douglas of Earth Rights Action in Nigeria says that people around the world have woken up to the fact that the system of global capital has allowed "an unconscionable use of natural resources. This realization has empowered people in the North to connect with movements in the South that have been going on but largely unheard, unsung and unknown in the North." Douglas feels it is quite
significant that "the globalized struggle has taken significant steps on the soil of America, well known for consumerism and self-interested action."
Indeed, from the building momentum of the debt relief movement, to the focused solidarity with the U'wa of Colombia and Ijaw and Ogoni of Nigeria, to the Free Tibet and Free Burma movements -- all of whom participated in the D.C. street protests -- solidarity with Third World struggles was one of the most impressive aspects of the last few days.
Community activists also made efforts to involve more people of color in
the anti-globalization movement here in the US in the lead up to this
week's protests. While more people of color were in the D.C. streets than in Seattle, the protests were still a far cry from a reflection of the increasingly diverse U.S. population, let alone Washington D.C. demographics. Building a diverse coalition is a long term process and anti-corporate globalization organizers must continue to strengthen their commitment to it.
Meanwhile John Stauber, editor of PR Watch and food safety advocate is
concerned that the focus on violence - though instigated by police and
media, not demonstrators - "plays into the hands of the corporations." He
worries that it "can be used to turn the middle class against the
protestors." Stauber says that "one of the biggest challenges of the
movement is to reach out to the disaffected mainstream."
He believes that focus on food is a good way to do that. Corporate control
of food supply and technology, especially genetically engineered foods and
food safety, are issues "where Ruckus folks and suburban families are in
fundamental agreement," according to Stauber. Non-destructive tactics in
supermarkets around genetically engineered foods might be one way to bridge
the gap between Middle America and activists says Stauber. He says these
kind of actions will help avoid the false impression that only people
willing to confront police on the streets can be part of this movement.
Another potential division, historically, is between the labor and
environmental movements. That gap was narrowed considerably in Seattle, and
many felt Washington was a test of the new alliances. Strengthening these
new ties and building a more diverse constituency is a critical area
of focus for the movement against corporate globalization.
Rob Weissman, editor of the Multinational Monitor and an organizer of Sunday's permitted rally on the Ellipse, says that Washington was "perhaps more
significant than Seattle" in terms of labor. Although labor did not produce
the large numbers of demonstrators that were present earlier in the week
weighing in on the China-WTO debate, it did actively endorse the rally
and send high level speakers who emphasized the new alliances. This is particularly significant given that just two years ago, the AFL-CIO supported the IMF.
Weissman says in part that this shows that organized labor values efforts
that are about solidarity with the new alliances. Lisa Hoyos, of the South Bay Labor Council of the AFL-CIO (San Jose, CA), says it also represents the recognition that
the "IMF is part of the cause of downward pressure on wages." Weissman agrees that the key insight for labor is a critique of export-led development. This critique of the World Bank-led development model, says Weissman, "meshes U.S. workers' interests with a new development model for the Third World."
With the movement for grassroots globalization budding and perhaps even beginning to bloom in the aftermath of Seattle and Washington D.C., activists are beginning to address some of the fundamental questions described above. How do we keep the pressure on, sustain the protests, integrate corporate campaigns into the bigger picture, continue to strengthen North-South cooperation, diversify the movement at home, build on the labor-environment alliances, and reach out to Middle America?
It's a tall order -- one that will require a tremendous amount of both energy and patience -- continuing street confrontation and broad coalition building -- strategic thinking and ongoing spontaneity. It's not going to be easy. But it should be fun trying!
Kenny Bruno is a Research Associate with TRAC-Transnational Resource & Action Center, CW's parent organization. Julie Light and Joshua Karliner contributed to this report.