29, 1999 7:00 AM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Human Rights
Turkey, Jonathan Sugden: 90-532-598-0771 (cell phone)
New York, Carroll Bogert: 212-216-1244
Short Comings in Oscalan Trial
- June 29 - Human Rights Watch today drew a sharp distinction between the trial
of Abdullah Ocalan and that of the tens of thousands of other people tried by
state security courts in Turkey.
With a verdict expected today in the trial of Ocalan, leader of the Kurdish Workers
Party (PKK), Human Rights Watch noted that the considerable latitude given for
the defendant to speak in his own defense was not typical of the Turkish state
security courts, where defendants' rights are restricted—particularly in the initial
stages of proceedings.
"There was an element of political theater in this trial," said
Jonathan Sugden, Turkey researcher for Human Rights Watch. "The court devoted
a lot of time to presenting the PKK as a creation of Turkey's foreign enemies.
But it neglected to uncover the chain of command between Ocalan and the crimes
committed by PKK members."
The Turkish government made considerable efforts to convince the
world that this would be a fair trial - even enacting a change to the constitution
last week to replace the court's military judge with a civilian one. Human Rights
Watch welcomed the removal of the military judge from State Security Court benches,
but restated its view expressed at the outset of the trial that there were other
serious problems with the independence of the judiciary in Turkey.
Sugden said that almost every day, in Istanbul, Ankara or Diyarbakir
State Security Court, defendants report to the bench that they were subjected
to ill-treatment or torture in police custody. In many cases, their allegations
are supported by medical evidence.
Human Rights Watch was satisfied that Abdullah Ocalan was not subjected
to torture in police custody, but the irregularities which occurred in the first
days of custody prejudiced the defendant's right of defense and tainted subsequent
proceedings. "It was in the first days after arrest that things started to go
wrong," said Sugden.
When Ocalan was brought to Turkey after his abduction from Kenya
in February, he was held in incommunicado police detention for nine days - far
in excess of international standards, and even of the limits imposed by Turkish
domestic law. Sugden therefore disagreed with observers from the Council of Europe,
who said on June 21 that "the trial . . . has been correct and in accordance with
the applicable Turkish law."
Meanwhile, Ocalan has been permitted only limited access to legal
counsel. During meetings with his lawyers, which were restricted in frequency
and duration, one or more security force members was present and within hearing.
During the initial stage of the investigation, lawyers were not permitted to bring
notes to interviews with their client.
Sugden noted also that once the process reached the courts, there
were other reminders of common State Security Court practice: the judges refused
to hear any of the witnesses proposed by the defense, and barred at least one
piece of their evidence from being read to the court on the grounds that it was
"The shortcomings in Ocalan's trial would have been grave in any
legal proceedings," said Sugden. "But they were quite unacceptable when a human
being is on trial for his life."
Ocalan is being tried under Article 125 of the Turkish Penal Code,
which carries a mandatory death sentence. Sugden urged the Council of Europe to
defend its goal of making Europe a death-penalty-free zone.
Turkey has never executed a prisoner sentenced by a State Security
Court, and has sustained a de facto moratorium on executions for 15 years. Human
Rights Watch urged Turkish politicians to hold to their principled position on
the death penalty. There are currently forty-two people on death row who have
exhausted all legal avenues.
Human Rights Watch noted that Ocalan was not directly charged with
any of the hundreds of PKK killings of unarmed Kurdish villagers, teachers or
prisoners, but rather with a 'crime against the state.' "Leaders should be held
to account, however, when their subordinates kill civilians or prisoners—clear
violations of international humanitarian law," said Sugden. "Milosevic and Pinochet
may stand trial for such crimes -- and Ocalan should, too."
|Common Dreams NewsCenter is a non-profit news service
providing breaking news and views for the Progressive Community.
press release posted here has been provided to Common Dreams NewsWire by
one of the many progressive organizations who make up America's Progressive Community.
you wish to comment on this press release or would like more information,
please contact the organization directly.
*all times Eastern US (GMT-5:00)
E-mail us your news release! firstname.lastname@example.org
© Copyrighted 1997-2000
All Rights Reserved. Common Dreams. www.commondreams.org