, 2000

Latest news from America's Progressive Community

Search | Sign Up | Privacy
  NewsCenter > NewsWire > For Immediate Release     


JUNE 9, 1999  3:44 PM
Institute for Public Accuracy
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020
David Zupan, (541) 484-9167
Was This War Necessary?
WASHINGTON - While many are claiming the peace agreement shows that Milosevic backed down, some analysts are suggesting that essentially the same agreement could have been achieved without bombing. They point to U.S. demands at Rambouillet in February that are absent from the current agreement. While some elements of the new accords remain unclear, apparent major differences between the Rambouillet text and the current agreement include:


  • Can keep only a few hundred, not a few thousand, troops in Kosovo


  • The international force can be deployed only in Kosovo, not throughout Yugoslavia

  • International force under UN -- not NATO -- auspices, with Russian component

  • UNHCR, not NATO, supervises return of refugees

  • No referendum on Kosovo independence


    Author of "Calling the Shots: How Washington Dominates Today's UN" and a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, Bennis said: "This agreement might have been achievable months earlier, without the devastation of Yugoslavia and the escalation of the anti-Albanian 'ethnic cleansing' in Kosovo wrought by NATO's bombing campaign."

  • MARJORIE COHN,,,1051,SAV-9905200 163,000.html
    Professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, Cohn said: "At Rambouillet, NATO presented Milosevic with an ultimatum impossible for him to accept. NATO has now diluted its demands but, to justify two months of bombing, claims Milosevic capitulated..."

    An associate professor of politics and chair of the Peace and Justice Studies Program at the University of San Francisco, Zunes said: "Most crucially, the insistence at Rambouillet that NATO troops have 'unimpeded access throughout the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia' has been dropped, limiting their role only to Kosovo..."

    A media analyst with Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting, Ackerman said: "Last week's Serb agreement was falsely reported as a total NATO victory. Then, when military talks broke down, it was claimed that the Serbs were reneging. In fact, those military talks were largely a NATO ploy -- unsuccessful -- to totally bypass the UN."



    Common Dreams NewsCenter is a non-profit news service
    providing breaking news and views for the Progressive Community.

    The press release posted here has been provided to Common Dreams NewsWire by one of the many progressive organizations who make up America's Progressive Community. If you wish to comment on this press release or would like more information, please contact the organization directly.
    *all times Eastern US (GMT-5:00)

    Making News?
    E-mail us your news release!

    Tell Us What You Think:

    Copyrighted 1997-2000 All Rights Reserved. Common Dreams.