Common Dreams NewsCenter


 Home | NewswireAbout Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

Home > Progressive Community > NewsWire > For Immediate Release     


Send this page to a friend
MARCH 20, 2001
1:43 PM
CONTACT:  Council for a Livable World
Dan Koslofsky - 202.546.0795 x100
Luke Warren - 202.546.0795 x127
Osprey Déjà vu, All Over Again
WASHINGTON - March 20 - As one of President Bush's Pentagon reviews is soon to be completed, defense experts are speculating which weapons programs will be cut. TheMarine Corps V-22 Osprey is one of the threatened systems, and we think it should end up on the chopping block as it did in 1989. The following are some excerpts from the upcoming Council for a Livable World Education Fund's FY 2002 Military Spending Briefing Book regarding the Osprey.

Is the V-22 is airworthy and safe? "The Osprey is a proven technology… purchased only after careful consideration for cost and operational effectiveness." - Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James Jones

Actually, this is not true. The V-22 has crashed four times, killing 30, including two crashes last year causing 23 fatalities. An August 2000 report by the Pentagon's Inspector General described 22 "major deficiencies" in the Osprey program. Recent evidence of falsified maintenance records, which is now fingering Marine generals, proves that the Marines closest to the V-22 know it will not fly as advertised. PhilipCoyle, the Pentagon's Director of Operational Testing and Evaluation, claimed in a Nov. 2000 report that the Osprey's poor reliability record"suggests the V-22 would be available to conduct fewer missions, would abort during a mission more often and would pose a significantly increased maintenance burden." A January 2001 GAO briefing revealed the Osprey's susceptibility to uncontrollable descents and accused the Navy of deleting"significant testing that would have provided additional knowledge on V-22 flying qualities…to meet program cost and schedule pressures." Most recently, the independent panel investigating the V-22's credibility accused Bell-Textron of purposefully glossing over the dangers of this uncontrollable descent, or vortex-ring state.

Is the V-22 needed by the Marines? The Corps has not engaged in an amphibious assault since the Korean War, yet they continue to insist the Osprey is necessary to bring troops ashore quickly. However, any potential quick troop deployment would be delayed until slower helicopters could transport the necessary heavy equipment the Osprey cannot carry. Moreover, Coyle noted that the V-22 can only complete its missions 57% of the time. Internal Marine documents show that percentage is usually significantly lower. If the Osprey cannot fly when needed, any potential advantage theV-22 may have over older transport helicopters is lost.

Aircraft Range Speed Max Payload Capacity Price*

Osprey 650 nm 240 knots 20,000 lbs 24 troops $58 mil.

CH-60 Seahawk 380 nm 180 knots 22,000 lbs 13 troops $18 mil.

UH-1Y Huey 350 nm 148 knots 18,500 lbs 13 troops $14 mil.**

CH-46E Sea Knight 132 nm 145 knots 24,300 lbs 22 troops NA

CH-53 Sea Stallion 578 nm 160 knots 40,000 lbs 37 troops NA

* Price per aircraft. Cost of Production, not including development costs ** UH-1N upgrades


Send this page to a friend
Common Dreams NewsCenter is a non-profit news service
providing breaking news and views for the Progressive Community.

The press release posted here has been provided to Common Dreams NewsWire by one of the many progressive organizations who make up America's Progressive Community. If you wish to comment on this press release or would like more information, please contact the organization directly.
*all times Eastern US (GMT-5:00)

Making News?
Read our Guidelines for Submitting News Releases

Tell Us What You Think:

Copyright 1997-2003 Common Dreams.